<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<!-- собрано плагином nlj-issue-importer -->
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Всероссийский научный журнал "Вопросы права"</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2949-0871</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24412/2949-0871-2025-2-114-117</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Other</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Формирование американской правовой системы</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The formation of the american legal system</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Вахитова</surname><given-names>Г.В.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vakhitova</surname><given-names>G.V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><email>mail@law-books.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лифанов</surname><given-names>А.В.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lifanov</surname><given-names>A.V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/><email>lifanovartem02@yandex.ru</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of International and Integration Law, Ufa, Institute of Law, University of Science and Technology</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">канд. фил. наук, доцент, доцент кафедры международного и интеграционного права Уфимского университета науки и технологий</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Master’s student, Ufa, Institute of Law, University of Science and Technology</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff4"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Магистрант, Уфимский университет науки и технологий</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2025-04-30"><day>30</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><issue>2</issue><fpage>114</fpage><lpage>117</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-04-21"><day>21</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-04-28"><day>28</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date></history><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Правовые системы современных государств весьма разнообразны и не всегда могут быть оценены с традиционных позиций. Происходящие процессы иногда приводят к формированию «так называемых комплексных правовых систем, примером которых и выступает правовая система США» [1], которая представляет собой уникальную дуалистическую систему, прошедшую собственный путь развития и сформировавшуюся как самостоятельное правовое явление, обладающее целым спектром признаков и особенностей, не присущих правовым системам иных стран. Правовую систему США традиционно относят к англосаксонской правовой семье, что не совсем справедливо, поскольку в США огромное значение имеют не только судебный прецедент, но и законодательство, как федеральное, так и отдельных штатов. В статье анализируются отдельные вопросы формирования в США уникальной правовой системы, определяются ее особенности в сравнении с классической английской правовой системой.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="summary"><p>The legal systems of modern States are very diverse and cannot always be assessed from a traditional perspective. The ongoing processes sometimes lead to the formation of “so-called complex legal systems, an example of which is the US legal system” [1], which is a unique dualistic system that has followed its own path of development and has emerged as an independent legal phenomenon with a whole range of features and features not inherent in the legal systems of other countries. The US legal system has traditionally been attributed to the Anglo-Saxon legal family, which is not entirely fair, since in the USA not only judicial precedent is of great importance, but also legislation, both federal and individual states. The article analyzes individual issues of the formation of a unique legal system in the United States, defines its features in comparison with the classical English legal system.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Англосаксонская правовая система</kwd><kwd>правовая система США</kwd><kwd>американская модель судебного прецедента</kwd><kwd>английское право</kwd><kwd>правовая доктрина США</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>The Anglo-Saxon legal system</kwd><kwd>the legal system of the USA</kwd><kwd>the American model of judicial precedent</kwd><kwd>English law</kwd><kwd>the legal doctrine of the USA</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Petrova E.A. Specifics of US law in the framework of the common law family // Legal policy and legal life. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 70-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Timonin A.N. The Anglo-Saxon model of the state: towards a discussion on the ideological and theoretical foundations // Lex Russica. 2015. No. 9. Pp. 87-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Petrova E.A. Features of the systematization of American legislation // Bulletin of SUSU. The pravo series. 2012. No. 7. Pp. 25-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Petrova E. A. Typologizing features of the American legal system // Leningrad Law Journal. 2020. № 4 (62). Pp. 59-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Petrova E. A. The stare decisis rule as the basis of judicial lawmaking in the USA // Leningrad Law Journal. 2015. № 3 (41). Pp. 246-254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Zheldybina T.A. Judicial precedent: a modern view // Russian Law: Education. Practice. Science. 2015. № 3 (87). Pp. 53-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Vankov A. A. American and European codes of laws and other normative legal acts: a comparative review // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2017. № 2 (63). Pp. 17-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Kokotov S.A. The problem of reception of sources of English law in the colonies of North America in the XVII – XVIII centuries // Bulletin of the Bryansk State University. 2013. No. 2. Pp. 151-156.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Nikolaev B.V., Emelin M. Y. The importance of legal doctrine in the systematization of U.S. legislation // News of higher educational institutions. The Volga region. Social sciences. 2014. № 3 (31). Pp. 5-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Nikolaev B.V., Emelin M.Yu., Khazov E.N. The main trends in the development of legal doctrine as a source of US law // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2014. No. 12. Pp. 94-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Petrova E.A. Specifics of US law in the framework of the common law family // Legal policy and legal life. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 70-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Timonin A.N. The Anglo-Saxon model of the state: towards a discussion on the ideological and theoretical foundations // Lex Russica. 2015. No. 9. Pp. 87-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Petrova E.A. Features of the systematization of American legislation // Bulletin of SUSU. The pravo series. 2012. No. 7. Pp. 25-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Petrova E. A. Typologizing features of the American legal system // Leningrad Law Journal. 2020. № 4 (62). Pp. 59-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Petrova E. A. The stare decisis rule as the basis of judicial lawmaking in the USA // Leningrad Law Journal. 2015. № 3 (41). Pp. 246-254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Zheldybina T.A. Judicial precedent: a modern view // Russian Law: Education. Practice. Science. 2015. № 3 (87). Pp. 53-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Vankov A. A. American and European codes of laws and other normative legal acts: a comparative review // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2017. № 2 (63). Pp. 17-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Kokotov S.A. The problem of reception of sources of English law in the colonies of North America in the XVII – XVIII centuries // Bulletin of the Bryansk State University. 2013. No. 2. Pp. 151-156.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Nikolaev B.V., Emelin M. Y. The importance of legal doctrine in the systematization of U.S. legislation // News of higher educational institutions. The Volga region. Social sciences. 2014. № 3 (31). Pp. 5-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Nikolaev B.V., Emelin M.Yu., Khazov E.N. The main trends in the development of legal doctrine as a source of US law // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2014. No. 12. Pp. 94-97.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
